Muscle Chat Bodybuilding Forum - Fitness and Sports Nutrition

Go Back   Muscle Chat Bodybuilding Forum - Fitness and Sports Nutrition > Performance Enhancement and Supplementation > Prohormones and legal performance enhancers
Register

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-10-2004, 10:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
Under Construction
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 25
Rep Power: usman664
Default Side effects of prohormones

I was just reading an article on another website about various tests of anabolic users vs natural users and the side effects that the anabolic steroids users got. does prohormones do the same thing as steroids do or is it different...like for example...increase in heart size, left ventricle and all these things...?
usman664 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2004, 06:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
Making Progress
 
GettinSwole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: GettinSwole
Default

basically any side effect you can get from steroids, u get from pro-hormones as well

______________________
thricefan@cyber-rights.net
You have to do what others won't to achieve what others don't.
GettinSwole is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2004, 07:28 AM   #3 (permalink)
Under Construction
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 25
Rep Power: usman664
Default

so why dont they just call them steroids...what about nor andro 19 is that different to steroids...i heard it dosnt really give side effects.
usman664 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2004, 05:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
Making Progress
 
GettinSwole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: GettinSwole
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usman664
so why dont they just call them steroids...what about nor andro 19 is that different to steroids...i heard it dosnt really give side effects.
Well, some "pro-hormones" are actually pro-steroids meaning that they are steroidal... the pro just means that they are not illegal b/c of a loophole in the law. 1-testosterone is an example of this. It requires no conversion to a parent hormone b/c it is an active hormone in itself. 4-ad is a pro-hormone... it converts to testosterone in the liver. 19-norandro is a pro-hormone with fewer sides than most. The downside to 19-nor is that it also is the least beneficial in terms of mass/strength of the pro-hormones IMO.

______________________
thricefan@cyber-rights.net
You have to do what others won't to achieve what others don't.
GettinSwole is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2004, 01:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Rep Power: Anonymous
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GettinSwole
Quote:
Originally Posted by usman664
so why dont they just call them steroids...what about nor andro 19 is that different to steroids...i heard it dosnt really give side effects.
Well, some "pro-hormones" are actually pro-steroids meaning that they are steroidal... the pro just means that they are not illegal b/c of a loophole in the law. 1-testosterone is an example of this. It requires no conversion to a parent hormone b/c it is an active hormone in itself. 4-ad is a pro-hormone... it converts to testosterone in the liver. 19-norandro is a pro-hormone with fewer sides than most. The downside to 19-nor is that it also is the least beneficial in terms of mass/strength of the pro-hormones IMO.
indeed

in the case of M1T, many consider it more potent than d-bol but it is a new substance and therefore has not yet been made illegal (but it will be illegal in roughly 3 months time in the USA, and it has just been made class C over here)
Anonymous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2004, 11:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Rep Power: Anonymous
Default

i used mit, i didnt get any affects at all. i dont no if this is becauise i am already big. and very strong. i was running it at 20 -30mg a day for 4 weeks,

however 19 nor run a 1000mg a day, gives much better results in strength. 40kg increase in deddlift in a week.

this is my opinion. i have used them both.

the 19nor 250 i used was ast. the mit was underground labs.

underground labs mit is cheap incomparison to most other brands, this could be the reason it didnt have any affect.

has anyone else use underground labs mit?

what does IMO mean godfather i aint actually worked out what this mean yet
Anonymous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2004, 11:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Making Progress
 
GettinSwole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: GettinSwole
Default

I used Underground Labs for my first M1t cycle and gained 13 lbs in 6 weeks. I will vouch for its quality. I really don't understand how you could get better results from 19nor than you did m1t, but i guess everyone is different

______________________
thricefan@cyber-rights.net
You have to do what others won't to achieve what others don't.
GettinSwole is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2004, 11:58 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Rep Power: Anonymous
Default

yeah everyone was saying how great mit was, so i thought i,d have some of it.

i was looking forward to gaining the pounds, starting weight 16 stone,

finishing weight about 16stone 4lbs, and this is nothing i couldnt gain naturally.

it is really strange maybe it didnt like me, anyway i am going to try it again, post the resulst on here

what dosage was you running?
Anonymous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2004, 12:03 AM   #9 (permalink)
Making Progress
 
GettinSwole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: GettinSwole
Default

I was running 15mg per day w/ a 2 weeks on/ 2 weeks off cycle stacked with 4ad. The cycle looked like this
Weeks 1&2: 15mg M1t, 600mg 4ad transdermal
Weeks 3&4: 20mg Nolva, 600mg 4ad
Weeks 5&6: 15mg M1t, 600mg 4ad
Weeks 7-8: 20mg Nolva, 300mg 6-oxo, ZMA

Most successful short cycle I have ever done.

______________________
thricefan@cyber-rights.net
You have to do what others won't to achieve what others don't.
GettinSwole is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2004, 01:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Rep Power: Anonymous
Default

do you reckon it could have been the 4ad giving the resulst instead,?

have you tried mit on its own?

cheers
Anonymous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 AM.



---------------
---------------
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All information contained within this site is for educational purposes only.
We do not endorse the Buying or selling of illegal substances nor do we promote the use of them.

Musclechat.co.uk takes no responsibility for any advertisers, thier content or products sold. All products sold by ANY advertisers are seen to be 'Research Items' only and not intended for Human Use