![]() | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Making Progress | Hi Guys, now i agree with both of you in what you have just said, but as i am relatively new to these, i will put this to you both, because they are called prohormones and they or some of them are converted, and have steroid "like" effects, surely from an ignorant point of view unless, they say they are steroids then they should not be, nor the person(s) taking them should be classed or categorised as basically unclean, this department is something i am very keen on researching and the formulae(s) and structures, also intrigue me, take 19 nor i was using the effects were good no side effects, but the fact that the company whom manufactured these if you like, didnt alter them they really only tampered with them to coin a phrase, extracting atoms in certain positions etc, i know this is a little long but the more feedback i get from you guys the more it will help my research, i hope you dont mind. Dave. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Making Progress Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 164 Rep Power: ![]() | Hi Dave, I see where you are coming from..Prohormones induce a conversion process, undertaken by your own body..As opposed to steroids, where no conversion takes place. Not sure it makes too much difference myself, as pro-hormones are only one step removed.. Good too hear that you are not getting sideys and the results are good. If I take PH's again I might give those a blast |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 0 Rep Power: ![]() | i,m gonna disagree with you guys i still class my self as natural even though i have done prohormones. i no the gains you get off prohormones aint anywhere near as much as you get off gear, and if there sold in a shop just like vitamins why cant people who use them be called clean. anyway i aint tried some of the newer ones like mit etc, i,m gonna be doing a course soonish,so this might change my mind. thats just my opinion guys cheers steve |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 0 Rep Power: ![]() | You could apply the arguement that out of two athletes one trained whilst one didn't - does the athlete who trained have an unfair advantage? The above statement maybe a bit extreme, but I say no, if you use PH's then you cannot be classed as natural as you have knowingly taken a substance that (for the most part) has been well documented to increase testosterone production to beyond the bodys' natural capacity to do so - this for me is the 'boundary' between natural and ahem, chemically assisted. What brand where you using Dave - I quite fancy doing a 19Nor/4AD stack over winter and was thinking about Ergopharm (I like their oral 4AD product)? |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |