Muscle Chat Bodybuilding Forum - Fitness and Sports Nutrition

Go Back   Muscle Chat Bodybuilding Forum - Fitness and Sports Nutrition > Supplements and Nutrition > Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-03-2008, 09:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
wogihao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 189
Rep Power: wogihao is on a distinguished road
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by sitries View Post
it will be interesting to see what others opinion is on this. My experience kind of supports this view really. 1st cycle - start weight - 12stone end weight - 13.9stone! 2 years went by and then i started another cycle. start weight - 12.3stone weight 9 weeks in - 13.3.

so going by this evidence, i kept very little of the weight that i gained on the initial cycle. You must take into account however that i was travelling for 14months out of that 24 and i was out on the piss and training very little. If i hadnt of doen the 1st cycle then i think i would of been 11.5 stone when i got bk from travelling. therefore overall, i think the steroids have increased my baseweight.
No, whats happeend is your first cycle you streached your muscle facilia (is that how its spelt), your muscle cells volumized gave you additional size and weight.

Now, you finish your cycle no more hormones to suport that mass, the mass goes down (its mostly water and nutrents anyway). however your muscle facilia is still streached... so 2 years later you go back on the sauce and your body fills the facilia easly and gives you even more growth..

That said its not the optimal way to do it, probably doing a short burst cycle that streaches the muscle facilia induces some growth then recover wait a bit then do the same thing again, your quickly get to your old size and streach the facilia some more. rince repeat.

See thats what people are saying when they talk about the bro-ism of "muscle memory" its not that the muscle cells magicly rember that there for-fathers were once masive its the facilia that is essentialy saggy that meens that the muscle bellies get much fuller compaired to the first run when the nutrents are forced into them from the medication.

I think thats how it works anyway. Nobody realy knows for sure.
wogihao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 09:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 620
Rep Power: sitries is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by wogihao View Post
No, whats happeend is your first cycle you streached your muscle facilia (is that how its spelt), your muscle cells volumized gave you additional size and weight.

Now, you finish your cycle no more hormones to suport that mass, the mass goes down (its mostly water and nutrents anyway). however your muscle facilia is still streached... so 2 years later you go back on the sauce and your body fills the facilia easly and gives you even more growth..

That said its not the optimal way to do it, probably doing a short burst cycle that streaches the muscle facilia induces some growth then recover wait a bit then do the same thing again, your quickly get to your old size and streach the facilia some more. rince repeat.

See thats what people are saying when they talk about the bro-ism of "muscle memory" its not that the muscle cells magicly rember that there for-fathers were once masive its the facilia that is essentialy saggy that meens that the muscle bellies get much fuller compaired to the first run when the nutrents are forced into them from the medication.

I think thats how it works anyway. Nobody realy knows for sure.
if this is the case though, why havent i got back upto the 13.9 size that i was in my 1st cycle and added some more mass?? the lower weight can be explained i suppose coz i am carrying lower bf this time and im carrying less water also.

i like the idea of the shorter cycles now though.. im going to try using shorter esters for my next cycles to see how they pan out. its all about trial and error i suppose and finding out what works best for you. im thinking eather tbol and test prop next time around or if i wana do it as another ean bulker then il do test prop and deca NPP. The duration will be 6 weeks.

Last edited by sitries; 19-03-2008 at 09:44 PM.
sitries is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 09:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
 
Gazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 540
Rep Power: Gazz is on a distinguished road
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

hmmm it would be every hard to say that the cycle you first took was the reason your weight stayed at the 12 stone mark.And you can't be 100% sure that you would of dropped to 11.5 stone if you had'nt of taken it.The human body adapts to its environment so going 14 months without a consistency in your training would of had the most detrimental effect on your weight because your muscles lacked the need to be that size.I agree with Wogi about the muscle Fascia aspect.But also,as we all get older our bodies metabolism slow and we gradually put on weight aswell.

______________________
"Practice puts brains in your muscles"
Gazz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 11:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
wogihao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 189
Rep Power: wogihao is on a distinguished road
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazz View Post
hmmm it would be every hard to say that the cycle you first took was the reason your weight stayed at the 12 stone mark.And you can't be 100% sure that you would of dropped to 11.5 stone if you had'nt of taken it.The human body adapts to its environment so going 14 months without a consistency in your training would of had the most detrimental effect on your weight because your muscles lacked the need to be that size.I agree with Wogi about the muscle Fascia aspect.But also,as we all get older our bodies metabolism slow and we gradually put on weight aswell.
Yes thats also true its a combination of factors i would guess.
wogihao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2008, 09:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
Musclechat Icon
 
Bodyworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: west yorkshire
Posts: 933
Rep Power: Bodyworks is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by wogihao View Post
Im going to be honest with you, I dont think your find that any of the gains on cycle are keepable in the long run. With cycleing as it stands now your basicly going on for say 9 weeks then takeing 9 weeks off before your doing another cycle in many cases (with time on time off) when you think about it your only realy going to be clear of the meds for 4-5 weeks depending on the medication used and the amounts.

so you crash for 4 weeks then go back on but your not going to be off long enough to lose it all so thats classed as a keepable gain..

I would say without aas suplementation or slin/hgh use you wont keep any of the gains from a cycle over the long term without going back on fairly sharpish.

i agree 100% with this. years of training wields permanent gains. drugs provide short term alterations to the physique due to the influence of hormones. remove the exogenous hormones, and the alterations made will gradually (or maybe not so gradually) subside. what's left is what you've earned through hard work, that's all.

as for any cutting cycles, remember the key ingredient is fat loss. the drugs you mentioned are there to support muscle retention, possibly provide a slight increase in muscle density, and give you a 'harder' looking physique. none of that will happen without dropping bodyfat, which those drugs don't do.
Bodyworks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 10:55 AM   #16 (permalink)
Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 620
Rep Power: sitries is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

the problem i see with cutting cycles is that it would feel like a bit of a waste of gear. reason being - steroids are prmarilt meant for building muscle - but they wont do that if you dont feed them. maybe it would be better for me to hit another 6 week bulker with test prop and Deca NPP. then do the cutting part naturally, with diet and cardio, and maybe aided by a small oral cycle like anavar or tbol to stop my muscles wasting away. any views on this guys??
sitries is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 11:10 AM   #17 (permalink)
Illuminati
 
crazycal1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,640
Rep Power: crazycal1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to crazycal1
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

i think if your training is spot on,with plenty of cardio,your diet is clean and around maintainence cals you should be able do a cycle and make a noticable difference to your body composition.

______________________
einsteins mind was the key to all things...to understand more than to know.

www.englishmuscle.co.uk
www.extremenutrition.co.uk
crazycal1 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 11:25 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
Gazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 540
Rep Power: Gazz is on a distinguished road
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by sitries View Post
the problem i see with cutting cycles is that it would feel like a bit of a waste of gear. reason being - steroids are prmarilt meant for building muscle - but they wont do that if you dont feed them. maybe it would be better for me to hit another 6 week bulker with test prop and Deca NPP. then do the cutting part naturally, with diet and cardio, and maybe aided by a small oral cycle like anavar or tbol to stop my muscles wasting away. any views on this guys??
Well thats my usual routine.I need all the help i can get,bulking.Building the body is the hard part.Ive never had and problems cutting.Ive always done that part naturally.A diet change with lots of circuit and cardio training and i cut easily.But im leaning towards a cutting cycle too.I was told running Anavar with small doses of Test e works well!You will start filling out to begin with but once the Var kicks in it shred's you up.This is just word of mouth though.I would go for it.Be nice to see how you get on.

______________________
"Practice puts brains in your muscles"
Gazz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 01:49 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderator
Musclechat Icon
 
Bodyworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: west yorkshire
Posts: 933
Rep Power: Bodyworks is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

anavar does not burn fat to any necognisable degree. steroids don't do that. with already low bodyfat levels, an increase of androgens in the abscence of increased estrogen levels the shredded look is possible. and before anyone goes on about androgens burning fat, their effect on this is not significant. the 'cutting cycle' gear therefor, is the non aromatising or low affinity for aromatising compounds, like anavar. or you could just use test e and an AI or anti E. or in fact, anything as long as the estrogen is kept in check.
Bodyworks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 02:39 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
Gazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 540
Rep Power: Gazz is on a distinguished road
Default Re: cycle results - week 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodyworks View Post
anavar does not burn fat to any necognisable degree. steroids don't do that.
I'm aware of that mate.I was'nt looking for the steroid to burn my fat,thats down to me,my diet and my cardio.So in theory you could use anything as long as aromatization is nipped in the bud?

______________________
"Practice puts brains in your muscles"
Gazz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.musclechat.co.uk/performance-enhancement-anabolic-steroids/24757-cycle-results-week-9-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
steroids: Blogs, Photos, Videos and more on Technorati This thread Refback 19-03-2008 02:16 PM
diet » Blog Archive » cycle results - week 9 This thread Pingback 19-03-2008 02:20 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 week out cycle J-man Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids 5 20-07-2007 08:40 PM
4 week bulking cycle?? modulman Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids 11 30-06-2007 12:11 AM
Finsished a DNP cycle last week Darren Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids 3 09-04-2006 10:42 AM
10 Week Bulking Cycle GettinSwole Progress Journals 6 14-10-2005 10:59 PM
8 week 1-Test & 4AD cycle with dbol to kickstart? Anonymous Prohormones and legal performance enhancers 1 14-01-2005 06:08 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 AM.



---------------
---------------
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
All information contained within this site is for educational purposes only.
We do not endorse the Buying or selling of illegal substances nor do we promote the use of them.

Musclechat.co.uk takes no responsibility for any advertisers, thier content or products sold. All products sold by ANY advertisers are seen to be 'Research Items' only and not intended for Human Use