![]() | |
| |
#1 (permalink)
|
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Staffordshire Posts: 891 Rep Power: ![]() | Guy's why would one use Arimidex over Nolva, its a lot more expensive that i know, and from my brief research im guessing the growth factor is going to be better with Arimidex, not that its a muscle building steroid because i know its not. It basically acts the same as nolva but in a different way. Thank you |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Making Progress | My understanding is that they dont act in the same way but do have similar effects - Nolva is a SERM and basically acts as a synthetic form of estrogen which binds with the receptor preventing natural estrogen from doing so. Adex actually prevents estrogen production in the first place. basically, it would more depend on your needs than anything as to which you would use.. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator Super Moderator Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,021 Rep Power: ![]() | Adex supress estrogen by upto 96% so you have much less estrogen, Nolvadex prevents estrogen binding to receptors as opposed to supressing the estrogen in your system this is how they differ. Any AI is going to be much better during a course if you suffer from estrogen than Nolvadex. ______________________ www.omegalabs.co.uk http://www.extremenutrition.co.uk/at...ough/index.php |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Moderator Musclechat Icon Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,984 Rep Power: ![]() | nolva basically clogs up the estrogen receptor sites.. so less gets "used" by your body.. a crude way of doing things i suppose arimidex in laymens terms means theres ALOT less estrogen floating about your body in the first place ______________________ If your not a part of the greatest... you got to be the greatest yourself! For the best supplements: www.extremenutrition.co.uk |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Moderator Musclechat Icon Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,984 Rep Power: ![]() | yes less estrogen is better if you have the money to spend then yes its worth it.. but dont go selling the dog or anything ______________________ If your not a part of the greatest... you got to be the greatest yourself! For the best supplements: www.extremenutrition.co.uk |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator Super Moderator Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,021 Rep Power: ![]() | less is better to a degree it is very unhealthy to get rid of all estrogen or keep it low for to long as the body uses it for many every day functions. ______________________ www.omegalabs.co.uk http://www.extremenutrition.co.uk/at...ough/index.php |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Moderator Musclechat Icon Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: west yorkshire Posts: 1,009 Rep Power: ![]() | paul is correct as always. if you are trying to add mass and aren't particularly susceptible to gyno however, i'd use neither. there is a strong theory that states estrogen plays an important role in muscle building and lowering levels can inhibit gains to some degree. ______________________ my missus www.rachael-grice.co.uk |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| arimidex during pct? | redneil75 | Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids | 20 | 24-10-2006 09:06 AM |
| nolva or arimidex with deca? | redneil75 | Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids | 11 | 18-08-2006 03:56 PM |
| Arimidex. | Caz84 | Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids | 2 | 20-09-2005 10:28 PM |
| Arimidex or nolva or both? | doctor greenwell | Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids | 4 | 30-09-2004 08:31 AM |
| Anastrozole Arimidex | Anonymous | Performance Enhancement & Anabolic steroids | 0 | 05-08-2004 02:44 PM |