Dbol kickstart or wait until injectables kicked in then star

divie · 02-08-2005, 10:03 PM

I dont get why people generally use Dbol as a kickstart surely its better if you wait for the injectable gear to kick in and then start the Dbol so you get a full 6 weeks when both compounds are working together as some injectables can take weeks to kick in.
Any opinions or reasons for the kickstart?.
Obviously every cycle doesnt require Dbol but you get my point.

02-08-2005, 10:24 PM

Moved to Steroids Forum.

02-08-2005, 10:42 PM

Personally I think a 4 week kickstart is a good idea for cycles with longer esters like EQ or deca. Let's say you're running EQ/Test E as part of your cycle it will take 4-5 weeks for EQ blood levels to peak and 3-4 weeks for the Test E. During those weeks of rising blood concentrations you won't make that much progress, - you major gains will be made during weeks 4-10. IMO you're not making optimum use of your cycle if you only run long esters.

zx9rjas. · 03-08-2005, 11:09 AM

I've heard of some people running DBol for 4 weeks at the beginnihng of their injectable cycle and then running dbol again for the last four weeks of the cycle

J

03-08-2005, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zx9rjas.

I've heard of some people running DBol for 4 weeks at the beginnihng of their injectable cycle and then running dbol again for the last four weeks of the cycle

J

How safe is this J and how long in total would the cycle be? Obviously 8 weeks of Dbol pluss x-weeks of IM.

zx9rjas. · 04-08-2005, 08:08 AM

Not sure If I'd run dbol twice in my cycles as I do worry about toxicity but Its usually on a 12+ week cycle so the dbol is run 4 weeks on, 4 weeks off and then 4 weeks on again.

02-08-2005, 10:03 PM	#1 (permalink)
divie Making Progress Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: somerset Posts: 436 Rep Power:	Dbol kickstart or wait until injectables kicked in then star I dont get why people generally use Dbol as a kickstart surely its better if you wait for the injectable gear to kick in and then start the Dbol so you get a full 6 weeks when both compounds are working together as some injectables can take weeks to kick in. Any opinions or reasons for the kickstart?. Obviously every cycle doesnt require Dbol but you get my point.

03-08-2005, 11:09 AM	#4 (permalink)
zx9rjas. Legend Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Southampton Posts: 696 Rep Power:	I've heard of some people running DBol for 4 weeks at the beginnihng of their injectable cycle and then running dbol again for the last four weeks of the cycle J ______________________ 50% of Training is nutrition 50% of Training is not overtraining If you cant gain see the above.

04-08-2005, 08:08 AM	#6 (permalink)
zx9rjas. Legend Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Southampton Posts: 696 Rep Power:	Not sure If I'd run dbol twice in my cycles as I do worry about toxicity but Its usually on a 12+ week cycle so the dbol is run 4 weeks on, 4 weeks off and then 4 weeks on again. ______________________ 50% of Training is nutrition 50% of Training is not overtraining If you cant gain see the above.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-08-2005, 10:24 PM	#2 (permalink)
redspy Guest Posts: n/a	Moved to Steroids Forum.

02-08-2005, 10:42 PM	#3 (permalink)
redspy Guest Posts: n/a	Personally I think a 4 week kickstart is a good idea for cycles with longer esters like EQ or deca. Let's say you're running EQ/Test E as part of your cycle it will take 4-5 weeks for EQ blood levels to peak and 3-4 weeks for the Test E. During those weeks of rising blood concentrations you won't make that much progress, - you major gains will be made during weeks 4-10. IMO you're not making optimum use of your cycle if you only run long esters.