![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Under Construction | http://www.hypertrophy-specific.com/hst_II.html This site suggests limited numbers of sets as opposed to the commonly used 4x6 or 3x10 for hypertrophy, as well as 'not training muscles to complete fatigue' for better size gains. What does everyone reckon to this lark? |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Legend Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Birmingham/Bristol Posts: 886 Rep Power: ![]() | There are lots of different methods to consider. HST is good, but different routines will suit different people - not everyone is happy with a reduced volume workout, it's a matter of trying different methods and finding what suits you. That said, its important to regularly change your training style so it doesn't stagnate. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Legend Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Southampton Posts: 697 Rep Power: ![]() | I always train to failure, I have experimented with sets etc and found that I am happy with my current routine that uses pretty high amount of sets for back, legs and chest Average amount for bi's, tri's and shoulders though J ______________________ 50% of Training is nutrition 50% of Training is not overtraining If you cant gain see the above. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Under Construction | Hmmm... looking more closely at the site, they recommend full body workout three times a week, but not at full intensity. While this seems a good idea, being required to do 2 sets of each exercise for most and having to warm up too, I think you'd be in the gym for a good 2 hours! |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |